www.MontanasTrailhead.com

So once you think the eleciton cycle is over and Christmas is upon us,  leave it to the reasonable blogs to put things in perspective for us.  However, I had to laugh once you figure out where the author is going with the whole reading.  Even we at www.Montanastrailhead.com try to keep our info respectful and clean, but we digress for a punny exception. 

With all do respect, it reminds me of a local Billings plumbing company that made a tv commercial.  It fact, it has a play on words but got the point across.  In addition, it was such a good job advertising that you probably still remember the local billings company that did it.  Anyhow, this article reminded me of the tv commercial as well. The following is but a little of the article: (pun intended)    

Title:        Libertarians Have Smaller Buts Than Rs and Ds

 Democrat’s buts are as big a field of solar panels.  Republican’s as wide as a South Florida condo complex. Eve Tea Partiers buts are as big as a Navy ship. And they are all flabby as hell, practically flapping in the wind.

Only libertarians have small, firm buts.

I’m not talking about where they sit. I am talking about where they stand. On government spending.

Across party lines, most Americans agree we need to tackle the deficit, including cutting spending. However, ask them what spending we should cut, and suddenly their big, giant, flabby buts are exposed.

Democrats say: cut defense spending, corporate welfare, BUT don’t cut spending on alternative energy, social programs, or health care.

Republicans say:  cut spending on welfare, arts, and the EPA, BUT don’t cut social security, education, or farm subsidies.

Even Tea Partiers say: cut spending on most things, BUT don’t cut defense or immigration enforcement.

In other words, they all say: cut spending on you, you, you, and that guy behind the tree, BUT please oh please don’t cut spending on ME!

(OK, I’ve beaten the butt of that dead horse enough)

Feel free to read the rest of the article here.